Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → United States → Jeremy Fleischman

People · United States

Jeremy Fleischman

3×3 one-handed · top 1.0% of 73,695 all-time · competing since April 2005 · 2005FLEI01

Jeremy Fleischman has been competing for 21 years. His best event is the 3×3 one-handed: a personal-best single of 9.95, set at Berkeley Winter 2017, puts him in the top 1.0% of the 73,695 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 162nd in the United States. Until December 2011, no official 3×3 one-handed solve in the world had been that fast. Across 131 competitions since April 2005, he has put 3,672 official solves on the record across ten events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 10% around a typical one, steadier than 96% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 39.17 in April 2005 to 7.16, an 82% improvement. Jeremy has entered 131 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

3×3 one-handed
best event — top 1.0% of 73,695 all-time
9.95
signature single · Berkeley Winter 2017
3,672
official solves on the record
10%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 96% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingUnited States
3×3 one-handed9.9513.71
top 1.0%162 / 15,683
3×37.169.39
top 1.5%914 / 59,724
2×22.154.24
top 5.8%2,333 / 40,951
3×3 Fewest Moves28 moves30.33
top 9.9%229 / 2,040
4×442.8045.99
top 15.5%2,340 / 19,072
5×51:34.021:49.48
top 30.7%2,429 / 9,401
Square-124.1935.20
top 37.2%2,424 / 6,743
Megaminx2:26.472:38.31
top 59.5%4,474 / 7,841
3×3 blindfolded4:39.115:32.39
top 76.0%1,580 / 2,092
7×79:06.02—
early days — 1 solve3,051 / 3,184

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Caltech Spring competition 2005: 39.17Caltech Spring competition 2006: 29.35San Diego competition 2006: 30.41UC Berkeley Fall competition 2006: 21.48Caltech Winter competition 2007: 19.84Berkeley Spring competition 2007: 17.37Caltech Discovery Spring competition 2007: 17.56San Diego competition 2007: 16.38Berkeley Fall competition 2007: 15.16EPGY California Open 2008: 14.49Berkeley Spring competition 2008: 15.16San Diego Open 2008: 14.69UCSD Summer competition 2008: 14.13US Nationals and Open 2008: 11.90Berkeley Fall 2008: 13.97Caltech Fall 2008: 14.27San Francisco Open 2009: 13.21EPGY Stanford Winter 2009: 14.40Utah Open 2009: 13.18Berkeley Spring competition 2009: 13.53Discovery Science Center competition 2009: 13.58San Diego Open 2009: 13.86Berkeley Summer competition 2009: 12.96US Nationals 2009: 12.56Boulder 2009: 12.80World Rubik's Cube Championship 2009: 13.33Caltech Fall competition 2009: 10.72Berkeley Fall competition 2009: 10.94Stanford Fall competition 2009: 11.81Bayview Hills Open 2010: 12.07Berkeley Winter 2010: 11.31EPGY Stanford Winter 2010: 11.86Reno Lake Tahoe Winter 2010: 11.09Berkeley Spring 2010: 11.77Discovery Science Center competition 2010: 12.15Stanford Spring 2010: 11.08San Diego Open 2010: 12.71United States Rubik's Cube Championships 2010: 12.52Berkeley Fall 2010: 10.91MIT Fall 2010: 9.86Berkeley Winter 2011: 9.63EPGY Stanford Winter 2011: 10.96Dallas Open 2011: 11.32Vidar Open 2011: 11.16Kansas Cube-Off 2011: 11.59Houston Spring 2011: 9.94Stanford Spring 2011: 11.43San Diego 2011: 10.66Arizona Open 2011: 10.77Berkeley Summer 2011: 10.30United States National Championships 2011: 10.59World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011: 11.02Stanford Fall 2011: 9.91Caltech Fall 2011: 10.77Berkeley Fall 2011: 10.68Berkeley Winter 2012: 10.22Caltech Winter 2012: 10.19EPGY Stanford Winter 2012: 9.15Berkeley Spring 2012: 11.36Harvard Spring 2012: 10.19Cal Day 2012: 10.81Stanford Spring 2012: 9.68Kansas Cube Off 2012: 10.09United States National Championships 2012: 10.36Berkeley Fall 2012: 10.11Stanford Fall 2012: 10.00Berkeley Autumn 2012: 11.91Berkeley Winter 2013: 8.52Berkeley Spring 2013: 8.69World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013: 8.65Berkeley Summer 2013: 9.56Berkeley Fall 2013: 9.84Caltech Fall Open 2013: 9.31Berkeley Winter 2014: 9.84Bay Area Speedcubin' 2 2014: 9.72Berkeley Mind Sports 2014: 9.71Berkeley Spring 2014: 9.72US Nationals 2014: 8.22Berkeley Summer 2014: 9.77BASC 4: Día de los Cubos 2014: 10.33Berkeley Winter 2015: 9.46Berkeley Spring 2015: 10.11SPCS Stanford Spring 2015: 9.18BASC 6 2015: 11.17Danish Open Championships 2015: 7.31World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 10.24US Nationals 2015: 8.89Atlanta Open 2015: 10.14Hayward Rubik's Rumble 2015: 9.10Bay Area Speedcubin' 8 2016: 11.32Atomic Cubing 2016: 9.71Reno Open 2016: 9.25European Rubik's Cube Championship 2016: 8.29Oregon 2016: 9.89Berkeley Summer 2016: 8.12Hayward Rubik's Rumble 2016: 9.54Reno Fall 2016: 8.95Berkeley Fall 2016: 8.57Berkeley Winter 2017: 9.05SacCubing I 2017: 9.05Bay Area Speedcubin' 10 2017: 7.16Latin America Cubing Tour - Cochabamba 2017: 9.44Latin America Cubing Tour - Arequipa 2017: 8.63Latin America Cubing Tour - Lima 2017: 7.91Latin America Cubing Tour - Chía 2017: 8.48Latin America Cubing Tour - Guatemala 2017: 9.09Latin America Cubing Tour - Santo Domingo 2017: 9.20World Rubik's Cube Championship 2017: 9.44Berkeley Summer 2017: 7.42San Ramon Cubed 2017: 8.55Berkeley Fall 2017: 8.70South Enough 2018: 8.72Berkeley Winter 2018: 9.39CubingUSA Western Championship 2018: 9.15West Coast Cubing Tour - Cupertino 2018: 10.32Berkeley Summer 2018: 9.41Bay Area Speedcubin' 13 2019: 10.43Bay Area Speedcubin' 15 2019: 8.59Berkeley Summer 2019: 8.15Bay Area Speedcubin' 29 AM 2022: 9.09Bay Area Speedcubin' 54 Live - SSF 2023: 9.757.1639.1716 Apr 20055 Nov 2023

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-8 3×3 one-handed single — 151 people have one; it is 1.95 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 1.16 away.

Targets move as he improves.