Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Germany → Lucas Garron

People · Germany

Lucas Garron

2×2 · top 0.68% of 186,767 all-time · competing since January 2006 · 2006GARR01

Lucas Garron has been competing for 21 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 1.06, set at Stanford Fall competition 2009, puts him in the top 0.68% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 30th in Germany. Until November 2008, no official 2×2 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 110 competitions since January 2006, he has put 3,615 official solves on the record across 16 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 13% around a typical one; 59% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 1:02.27 in January 2006 to 7.27, an 88% improvement. Lucas has entered 110 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 0.68% of 186,767 all-time
1.06
signature single · Stanford Fall competition 2009
3,615
official solves on the record
13%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 59% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingGermany
2×21.063.70
top 0.68%30 / 2,875
3×37.279.22
top 1.7%96 / 4,109
3×3 one-handed11.2115.77
top 2.1%24 / 1,314
3×3 Fewest Moves26 moves28.67
top 6.2%39 / 338
4×437.8744.41
top 9.6%180 / 1,934
Pyraminx5.248.95
top 14.7%379 / 1,987
3×3 blindfolded1:09.721:36.55
top 16.0%56 / 343
5×51:21.661:40.63
top 20.4%213 / 1,158
Square-116.8027.71
top 20.5%97 / 533
Clock9.9311.61
top 24.8%171 / 634
Megaminx1:36.441:52.18
top 32.3%237 / 787
Skewb7.8512.34
top 40.1%539 / 1,169
4×4 blindfolded12:01.00—
top 66.6%57 / 85
6×64:22.085:01.96
top 72.4%376 / 586
7×76:28.82—
early days — 2 solves322 / 510
3×3 Multi-Blind1 of 2 cubes · 1:38—
early days — 2 solves120 / 142

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Caltech Winter competition 2006: 1:02.27US Nationals 2006: 28.82UC Berkeley Fall competition 2006: 20.42Caltech Winter competition 2007: 18.18Berkeley Spring competition 2007: 15.89Caltech Summer competition 2007: 15.92Berkeley Fall competition 2007: 13.81EPGY California Open 2008: 13.55Discovery Science Center competition 2008: 11.74Berkeley Spring competition 2008: 13.06US Nationals and Open 2008: 13.76Berkeley Fall 2008: 14.08Caltech Fall 2008: 12.84Discovery Science Center 10th Anniversary 2008: 11.97San Francisco Open 2009: 10.00EPGY Stanford Winter 2009: 12.06Berkeley Spring competition 2009: 11.05Berkeley Summer competition 2009: 10.65US Nationals 2009: 11.63World Rubik's Cube Championship 2009: 11.53Caltech Fall competition 2009: 12.19Berkeley Fall competition 2009: 9.15Stanford Fall competition 2009: 11.97Berkeley Winter 2010: 9.55EPGY Stanford Winter 2010: 11.46Berkeley Spring 2010: 10.97Stanford Spring 2010: 11.41United States Rubik's Cube Championships 2010: 10.55Long Island 2010: 10.59German Nationals 2010: 11.88European Rubik's Cube Championship 2010: 12.56Halloween Cube Open 2010: 8.05Berkeley Winter 2011: 11.50EPGY Stanford Winter 2011: 11.65Vidar Open 2011: 10.84Stanford Spring 2011: 12.41Berkeley Summer 2011: 9.86United States National Championships 2011: 10.86Stanford Fall 2011: 9.65Berkeley Winter 2012: 10.77EPGY Stanford Winter 2012: 10.94Cal Day 2012: 11.81Stanford Spring 2012: 10.65Berkeley Fall 2012: 11.40Stanford Fall 2012: 10.86Berkeley Winter 2013: 10.50Berkeley Spring 2013: 11.02World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013: 11.28Berkeley Summer 2013: 10.30Berkeley Fall 2013: 10.86Berlin Cube Day 2013: 9.94Berkeley Winter 2014: 10.66US Nationals 2014: 10.93Rubik's Cube European Championships 2014: 10.07Berkeley Summer 2014: 10.27BASC 4: Día de los Cubos 2014: 11.37Berkeley Fall 2014: 9.81BASC 5: Everything But 2x2 2015: 10.40SPCS Stanford Spring 2015: 9.43World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 10.89US Nationals 2015: 9.02Hayward Rubik's Rumble 2015: 9.94Berkeley Winter 2016: 10.37European Rubik's Cube Championship 2016: 10.00US Nationals 2016: 10.12Berkeley Fall 2016: 10.74World Rubik's Cube Championship 2017: 11.58Berkeley Fall 2017: 11.32Bay Area Speedcubin' 11 2018: 10.47WCA European Championship 2018: 7.27CubingUSA Nationals 2018: 10.09Berkeley Summer 2018: 9.95Berkeley Fall 2018: 9.82Welcome to 2019: 7.94Bay Area Speedcubin' 13 2019: 7.83Berkeley Spring 2019: 10.09WCA World Championship 2019: 8.14CubingUSA Nationals 2019: 9.18Berkeley Summer 2019: 10.89Berkeley Fall 2019: 10.00Bay Area Speedcubin' 24 2020: 9.03CubingUSA Western Championship 2021: 9.94Berkeley Summer 2022: 9.46Rubik's WCA North American Championship 2022: 10.58CubingUSA Nationals 2023: 9.47Rubik's WCA World Championship 2023: 10.08Bay Area Speedcubin' 53 - Berkeley 2023: 9.19Bay Area Speedcubin' 54 Live - SSF 2023: 9.26Berkeley Fall 2023: 9.32Bay Area Speedcubin' 59 LIVE - SSF 2024: 9.30Bay Area Speedcubin' 63 - Atherton 2024: 8.61Rubik's WCA North American Championship 2024: 7.98Rubik's WCA European Championship 2024: 9.13Berkeley Pre-Cal Day Tricubealon 2025: 9.31Rubik's WCA World Championship 2025: 9.64West Coast Cubing Western Championship 2025: 7.29Rubik's WCA North American Championship 2026: 7.99Rubik's WCA European Championship 2026: 10.33Bay Area Speedcubin' 69 2026: 10.327.271:02.2714 Jan 200629 Aug 2026

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,032 people have one; it is 0.06 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 1.27 away.

Targets move as he improves.