Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Brazil → Gilberto Caracciolo Morelli

People · Brazil

Gilberto Caracciolo Morelli

2×2 · top 25.2% of 186,767 all-time · competing since July 2008 · 2008CARA01

Gilberto Caracciolo Morelli has been competing for 18 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 3.90, set at Piracicaba Open 2013, puts him in the top 25.2% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 903rd in Brazil. Across 74 competitions since July 2008, he has put 1,558 official solves on the record across 16 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 14% around a typical one; 64% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 47.31 in July 2008 to 21.05, a 56% improvement. Gilberto has entered 74 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 25.2% of 186,767 all-time
3.90
signature single · Piracicaba Open 2013
1,558
official solves on the record
14%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 64% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingBrazil
2×23.908.00
top 25.2%903 / 5,137
3×3 Fewest Moves37 moves45.00
top 37.3%117 / 360
Pyraminx8.4712.06
top 40.3%971 / 3,208
3×321.0524.52
top 42.9%2,760 / 9,644
4×41:35.201:48.40
top 67.4%1,061 / 1,855
3×3 one-handed41.8555.15
top 67.9%1,184 / 1,992
Skewb12.5819.77
top 68.9%917 / 1,463
Clock21.5625.13
top 68.9%440 / 723
Square-145.5259.19
top 71.7%443 / 647
3×3 Multi-Blind2 of 2 cubes · 17:22
top 72.6%85 / 117
3×3 blindfolded5:14.63
top 81.5%245 / 333
5×53:24.984:23.96
top 85.2%647 / 845
Megaminx4:00.584:54.94
top 90.1%915 / 1,062
4×4 blindfolded36:44.00
early days — 1 solve49 / 49
7×716:52.00
top 99.6%265 / 269
6×612:41.00
early days — 3 solves307 / 307

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Minas Open 2008: 47.31São Paulo Open 2009: 47.68Brasília Open 2009: 35.36UNESP Open 2009: 34.31ABC Open 2010: 33.65SESC Santos 2010: 35.84Uberlândia Open 2010: 27.77SESC Santos 2011: 31.14Oficina Open 2012: 27.13SESC Santos 2012: 26.63Americana Open 2012: 25.02SESC Pompeia 2013: 25.22São Paulo Open 2013: 26.50Oficina Open 2013: 24.43Campeonato de Cubos Mágicos de São Carlos SP 2013: 24.11Piracicaba Open 2013: 24.05SESC Interlagos 2013: 22.97Brasileiro Etapa de Verão 2014: 27.96SESC Santo Amaro 2014: 25.54São Paulo Open 2014: 25.24Mogi Open 2014: 23.14SESC Santo Amaro 2015: 23.99Pré-Mundial 2015: 28.50FECAP Open 2015: 22.41Colégio IPÊ 2015: 24.46World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 23.85SESC Santos 2015: 23.29I ETEC Rubik Competition 2015: 26.79I Campeonato de Cubo Mágico de Barueri 2015: 25.38Open Cubo Mágico Domus Sapiens 2015: 24.44Fecap Open 2016: 22.64Oficina Open 2016: 23.23Brasileiro 2016: 28.02II ETEC 2016: 21.21Rubik's Cube Sorocaba 2016: 25.91Sumaré Open 2016: 23.72Orange Tech 2017: 24.07Arnold Classic South America 2017: 24.89Oficina Open 2017: 26.50Fecap Open 2017: 24.88SESC Santos 2017: 27.94Bicho Legal Open 2017: 25.59Sumaré Open 2017: 21.05Estância Open 2017: 22.02Arena Curuçá Open 2018: 26.33Fecap Open 2018: 25.35II Barueri Open 2018: 23.12Schoolmark Open 2018: 22.24Festival SESC Cubo Mágico 2018: 24.79Torneio de Cubo Mágico EJS 2019: 22.81Fecap Open 2019: 24.85V ETEC Jacareí Open 2019: 27.04III Barueri Open 2019: 21.54Schoolmark Open 2019: 33.42Etec Cubatão 2019: 23.89SESI Santos 2022: 31.99Fecap Open 2022: 25.65FECAP Open 2023: 28.30FECAP Open 2024: 29.9421.0547.6819 Jul 200825 May 2024

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-3 2×2 single — 26,570 people have one; it is 0.90 away.
  • A sub-8 Pyraminx single — 46,752 people have one; it is 0.47 away.

Targets move as he improves.