Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Brazil → Allyson Dias de Lima

People · Brazil

Allyson Dias de Lima

2×2 · top 0.45% of 186,767 all-time · competing since July 2011 · 2011LIMA01

Allyson Dias de Lima has been competing for 15 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 0.94, set at Nova Odessa Open 2014, puts him in the top 0.45% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 10th in Brazil. Until November 2011, no official 2×2 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 44 competitions since July 2011, he has put 2,691 official solves on the record across 16 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 12% around a typical one, steadier than 63% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 42.30 in July 2011 to 9.64, a 77% improvement. Allyson has entered 44 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 0.45% of 186,767 all-time
0.94
signature single · Nova Odessa Open 2014
2,691
official solves on the record
12%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 63% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingBrazil
2×20.944.12
top 0.45%10 / 5,137
Pyraminx3.316.84
top 4.7%103 / 3,208
3×39.6413.05
top 6.5%303 / 9,644
3×3 one-handed14.9419.94
top 8.0%108 / 1,992
Skewb3.747.74
top 9.2%103 / 1,463
3×3 Fewest Moves29 moves38.33
top 12.2%43 / 360
4×443.5054.36
top 16.4%194 / 1,855
Megaminx1:14.181:25.60
top 18.1%139 / 1,062
3×3 Multi-Blind9 of 9 cubes · 50:00
top 19.3%21 / 117
3×3 blindfolded1:19.462:12.01
top 19.4%47 / 333
Square-118.3029.27
top 24.1%132 / 647
Clock10.6912.22
top 28.5%183 / 723
5×51:45.621:58.54
top 39.6%230 / 845
6×63:37.644:19.30
top 57.8%149 / 307
4×4 blindfolded10:41.00
top 60.9%27 / 49
7×76:25.086:37.47
top 73.2%158 / 269

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

SESC Santos 2011: 42.30Oficina Open 2012: 15.94Agulhas Negras Open 2012: 17.31SESC Santos 2012: 16.94Americana Open 2012: 15.02SESC Pompeia 2013: 14.77São Paulo Open 2013: 15.65Oficina Open 2013: 12.50Campeonato de Cubos Mágicos de São Carlos SP 2013: 13.43Piracicaba Open 2013: 13.53SESC Interlagos 2013: 13.50Campeonato Brasileiro de Cubo Mágico 2013: 11.66SESC Araraquara 2013: 13.531º Aberto Valeparaibano de Cubo Mágico 2013: 13.34Brasileiro Etapa de Verão 2014: 12.89SESC Santo Amaro 2014: 11.58Oficina Open 2014: 12.31Educativa 2014: 13.45São Paulo Open 2014: 11.84Brasileiro Etapa de Inverno 2014: 11.76Nova Odessa Open 2014: 12.17Mogi Open 2014: 11.78Joana D'Arc Open 2014: 12.60SESC Santo Amaro 2015: 13.05Pré-Mundial 2015: 11.80FECAP Open 2015: 13.19Curitiba Open 2015: 11.82Oficina Open 2015: 13.88Brasilia Open 2015: 9.64Colégio IPÊ 2015: 11.51World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 11.80SESC Santos 2015: 12.85I ETEC Rubik Competition 2015: 10.62I Campeonato de Cubo Mágico de Barueri 2015: 13.44Uberlândia Open 2015: 11.68Porto Alegre Open 2015: 11.77Fecap Open 2016: 13.01Oficina Open 2016: 12.46Brasileiro 2016: 13.92II Barueri Open 2018: 13.11Open UTF ao Cubo 2019: 12.239.6442.3015 Jul 201117 Aug 2019

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-3 Pyraminx single — 4,700 people have one; it is 0.31 away.
  • A sub-8 3×3 single — 7,931 people have one; it is 1.64 away.

Targets move as he improves.