Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Brazil → Pedro Santos Guimarães

People · Brazil

Pedro Santos Guimarães

3×3 · top 1.7% of 284,439 all-time · competing since October 2007 · 2007GUIM01

Pedro Santos Guimarães has been competing for 19 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 7.30, set at SESC Santo Amaro 2014, puts him in the top 1.7% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 65th in Brazil. Until July 2008, no official 3×3 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 60 competitions since October 2007, he has put 3,233 official solves on the record across 16 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 12% around a typical one, steadier than 62% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 13.00 in October 2007 to 7.30, a 44% improvement. Pedro has entered 60 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

3×3
best event — top 1.7% of 284,439 all-time
7.30
signature single · SESC Santo Amaro 2014
3,233
official solves on the record
12%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 62% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingBrazil
3×37.3010.59
top 1.7%65 / 9,644
2×21.744.54
top 3.3%106 / 5,137
3×3 one-handed13.5918.74
top 5.4%64 / 1,992
3×3 blindfolded52.851:07.07
top 10.8%30 / 333
Clock7.469.37
top 12.8%81 / 723
Pyraminx5.057.23
top 13.5%322 / 3,208
3×3 Fewest Moves30 moves33.67
top 14.8%52 / 360
Square-115.5923.90
top 17.8%92 / 647
4×446.0650.79
top 19.6%250 / 1,855
Megaminx1:21.091:25.74
top 22.5%168 / 1,062
3×3 Multi-Blind7 of 7 cubes · 26:46
top 25.7%29 / 117
Skewb6.0913.00
top 26.4%331 / 1,463
5×51:40.211:53.68
top 35.6%201 / 845
4×4 blindfolded8:53.24
top 50.6%21 / 49
6×64:19.714:34.36
top 71.7%184 / 307
7×76:32.687:00.18
top 75.0%163 / 269

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

World Rubik's Cube Championship 2007: 13.00Brazil Open 2007: 12.63Minas Open 2008: 13.47São Paulo Open 2009: 11.66Santiago Open 2009: 13.97Brasília Open 2009: 11.71World Rubik's Cube Championship 2009: 12.25UNESP Open 2009: 11.41ABC Open 2010: 10.65SESC Santos 2010: 11.09Uberlândia Open 2010: 10.36SESC Santos 2011: 9.90Uberlandia Open 2011: 10.38Goiania Open 2011: 9.84Oficina Open 2012: 9.88Uberlândia Open 2012: 10.06SESC Santos 2012: 9.36Goiânia Open 2012: 9.34SESC Pompeia 2013: 9.59Campeonato de Cubos Mágicos de São Carlos SP 2013: 9.91Campeonato Brasileiro de Cubo Mágico 2013: 9.41Brasileiro Etapa de Verão 2014: 9.72SESC Santo Amaro 2014: 7.30Brasileiro Etapa de Inverno 2014: 9.19Uberlândia Open 2014: 9.66Pré-Mundial 2015: 7.48Colégio IPÊ 2015: 10.04World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 10.55Uberlândia Open 2015: 9.16Patos de Minas 2015: 11.01Hungarian Nationals 2016: 10.61Brasileiro 2016: 9.65Pão de Queijo Open 2016: 9.86Open Cidade da Criança 2016: 9.87Brasileiro 2017: 9.69SESC Santos 2017: 10.08UNESP Open 2017: 10.20Uberlândia Open 2017: 10.67Pão de Queijo Open 2017: 8.79Uberlândia Specials 2018: 9.99Pão de Queijo 2018: 9.11Campeonato Brasileiro 2018: 8.52UNESP Open 2018: 9.04Uberlândia Open 2018: 9.25Festival SESC Cubo Mágico 2018: 9.12WCA South American Championship 2018: 8.91Uberlândia Open 2019: 8.58Rubik's WCA South American Championship 2022: 12.00I Candanguim 2023: 9.07II Candanguim 2024: 12.12Escola Canadense de Brasília Open Cube 2025: 9.827.3013.975 Oct 20077 Jun 2025

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 1.30 away.
  • A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,032 people have one; it is 0.74 away.

Targets move as he improves.