People · Australia
Ramesh Vidyasagar
3×3 · top 2.7% of 284,439 all-time · competing since November 2013 · 2013VIDY01
Ramesh Vidyasagar has been competing for 13 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 7.94, set at Melbourne Cube Days 2018, puts him in the top 2.7% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 261st in Australia. Until July 2008, no official 3×3 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 23 competitions since November 2013, he has put 1,235 official solves on the record across twelve events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 14% around a typical one; 65% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 15.40 in November 2013 to 7.94, a 48% improvement. Ramesh has entered 23 competitions, more competitions than 97% of everyone who has ever competed.
Standing, event by event
vs everyone ever ranked| Event | PB single | PB average | All-time standing | Australia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3×3 | 7.94 | 9.90 | top 2.7% | 261 / 11,709 | |
| 2×2 | 1.64 | 2.41 | top 2.8% | 223 / 8,567 | |
| 4×4 | 32.16 | 38.71 | top 4.3% | 124 / 3,051 | |
| 3×3 one-handed | 15.25 | 20.51 | top 8.6% | 197 / 2,659 | |
| Pyraminx | 4.81 | 7.53 | top 12.0% | 561 / 5,993 | |
| 5×5 | 1:12.24 | 1:21.63 | top 13.2% | 179 / 1,356 | |
| Megaminx | 1:14.65 | 1:23.20 | top 18.4% | 218 / 1,277 | |
| 3×3 Fewest Moves | 32 moves | 35.33 | top 20.4% | 102 / 468 | |
| Skewb | 5.33 | 8.69 | top 20.7% | 539 / 3,534 | |
| Square-1 | 24.19 | 39.26 | top 37.2% | 358 / 899 | |
| 6×6 | 3:02.85 | 3:18.25 | top 42.4% | 265 / 641 | |
| 7×7 | 5:12.28 | 5:22.03 | early days — 3 solves | 269 / 523 |
Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.
The line so far
Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.
The story so far
- 23 Sep 2017Three personal bests in one day at Australian Nationals 2017.
- 7 May 2017Three personal bests in one day at Cube for Cambodia 2017.
- 5 Nov 2016Three personal bests in one day at Melbourne Cube Days 2016.
- 29 May 2016Three personal bests in one day at Connor's Cube Day 2016.
- 19 Mar 2016First sub-10 3×3: 9.88 at Cubing Classic 2016.
- 19 Mar 2016Three personal bests in one day at Cubing Classic 2016.
Competitions
- Melbourne Summer 2019 · 26 Jan 2019 — 2 personal bests set
- Melbourne Cube Days 2018 · 8 Dec 2018 — 2 personal bests set
- St Kevin's College Spring 2018 · 27 Oct 2018 — 1 personal best set
- Cube for Cambodia 2018 · 6 May 2018 — 1 personal best set
- ASFA Speedcubing 2018 · 17 Mar 2018
- Shaastra Cube Open 2018 · 6 Jan 2018 — 2 personal bests set
- Melbourne Cube Days 2017 · 18 Nov 2017 — 2 personal bests set
- Australian Nationals 2017 · 23 Sep 2017 — 3 personal bests set
- Cube for Cambodia 2017 · 7 May 2017 — 3 personal bests set
- Cubing Classic 2017 · 18 Mar 2017
- Melbourne Cube Days 2016 · 5 Nov 2016 — 3 personal bests set
- Connor's Cube Day 2016 · 29 May 2016 — 3 personal bests set
- Melbourne Autumn 2016 · 30 Apr 2016
- Cubing Classic 2016 · 19 Mar 2016 — 3 personal bests set
- Shaastra Cube Open 2016 · 23 Jan 2016 — 6 personal bests set
- Australian Nationals 2015 · 3 Oct 2015 — 3 personal bests set
- Melbourne Autumn 2015 · 22 Mar 2015 — 3 personal bests set
- Shaastra Cube Open 2015 · 3 Jan 2015 — 4 personal bests set
- Melbourne Cube Day 2014 · 9 Nov 2014 — 3 personal bests set
- Melbourne Summer 2014 · 15 Feb 2014 — 4 personal bests set
- Shaastra Cube Open 2014 · 4 Jan 2014 — 7 personal bests set
- Melbourne Cube Day 2013 · 16 Nov 2013 — 2 personal bests set
- Melbourne Spring 2013 · 9 Nov 2013 — 1 personal best set
Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.
The circuit
The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.
- Tommy Kiprillis — met in 166 rounds, finished ahead 30 times
- Jayden McNeill — met in 156 rounds, never finished ahead
- Feliks Zemdegs — met in 127 rounds, finished ahead once
Next targets
- A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 1.94 away.
- A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,032 people have one; it is 0.64 away.
Targets move as he improves.