Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Australia → Jayden McNeill

People · Australia

Jayden McNeill

3×3 · top 0.099% of 284,439 all-time · competing since February 2012 · 2012MCNE01

Jayden McNeill has been competing for 15 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 4.90, set at Australian Nationals 2022, puts him in the top 0.099% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 12th in Australia. Until November 2015, no official 3×3 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 146 competitions since February 2012, he has put 8,825 official solves on the record across 17 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 13% around a typical one, steadier than 53% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 14.03 in February 2012 to 4.90, a 65% improvement. Jayden has entered 146 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

3×3
best event — top 0.099% of 284,439 all-time
4.90
signature single · Australian Nationals 2022
8,825
official solves on the record
13%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 53% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingAustralia
3×34.906.76
top 0.099%12 / 11,709
2×20.691.55
top 0.11%25 / 8,567
3×3 one-handed7.6711.77
top 0.15%7 / 2,659
3×3 Fewest Moves18 moves20.00
top 0.17%1 / 468
4×424.7230.01
top 0.63%20 / 3,051
Pyraminx1.783.59
top 0.8%43 / 5,993
Skewb1.843.10
top 0.99%40 / 3,534
5×549.9856.73
top 1.7%21 / 1,356
Square-17.478.84
top 2.3%28 / 899
3×3 blindfolded27.1236.89
top 3.5%19 / 394
Megaminx48.2652.09
top 4.4%62 / 1,277
7×72:40.502:57.78
top 5.6%28 / 523
6×61:47.211:50.40
top 6.2%38 / 641
Clock6.547.74
top 9.3%112 / 1,095
3×3 Multi-Blind13 of 13 cubes · 45:08
top 10.1%21 / 180
4×4 blindfolded6:31.67
early days — 2 solves29 / 96
5×5 blindfolded25:52.00
early days — 1 solve42 / 51

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Melbourne Summer 2012: 14.03Sydney Autumn 2012: 12.06Melbourne Winter 2012: 11.09Australian Nationals 2012: 10.91Kurri Kurri 2012: 9.97Melbourne Cube Day 2012: 11.25Canberra Summer 2013: 8.63Shepparton Winter 2013: 8.47World Rubik's Cube Championship 2013: 8.89Australian Nationals 2013: 9.22Melbourne Spring 2013: 8.59Melbourne Cube Day 2013: 9.18Lifestyle Seasons Summer 2014: 8.22Canberra Summer 2014: 9.06Melbourne Summer 2014: 7.61Shepparton Autumn 2014: 7.66Northpark Adelaide 2014: 8.38Melbourne Winter 2014: 8.63Lifestyle Seasons Winter 2014: 9.27Australian Nationals 2014: 7.38Melbourne Cube Day 2014: 7.96Sydney Spring 2014: 7.53Niddrie 2014: 8.03Lifestyle Seasons Summer 2015: 5.91Melbourne Autumn 2015: 8.11Sydney Autumn 2015: 8.17Canberra Autumn 2015: 7.77Cube for Cambodia 2015: 8.13TCG & Friends 2015: 8.27World Rubik's Cube Championship 2015: 7.60Australian Nationals 2015: 6.47Melbourne Cube Days 2015: 7.33Sydney Summer 2015: 7.36Adelaide Summer 2016: 6.65Cubing Classic 2016: 8.27Sydney Autumn 2016: 6.30Canberra Autumn 2016: 7.62European Rubik's Cube Championship 2016: 6.14Czech Open 2016: 7.38US Nationals 2016: 6.79Michigan 2016: 7.10Oregon 2016: 7.18Wiscube 2016: 7.35KCubing Summer 2016: 7.07Canberra Spring 2016: 6.88Great South Open 2016: 7.04Melbourne Cube Days 2016: 7.18POPS Open 2016: 7.14Sydney Championship 2016: 6.74Cubing Classic 2017: 6.64Latin America Cubing Tour - Santiago 2017: 7.30Latin America Cubing Tour - Montevideo 2017: 6.84Latin America Cubing Tour - Cochabamba 2017: 7.03Latin America Cubing Tour - Arequipa 2017: 5.91Latin America Cubing Tour - Lima 2017: 6.31Latin America Cubing Tour - Chía 2017: 7.23London Open 2017: 7.10World Rubik's Cube Championship 2017: 7.03Australian Nationals 2017: 6.48Canberra Spring 2017: 6.86Melbourne Cube Days 2017: 6.65New Zealand Nationals 2017: 7.35Adelaide Summer 2018: 7.18ASFA Speedcubing 2018: 5.42Canberra Autumn 2018: 6.68Melbourne Winter 2018: 6.74West Coast Cubing Tour - Los Angeles 2018: 6.68West Coast Cubing Tour - Fresno 2018: 6.27West Coast Cubing Tour - Cupertino 2018: 4.97SnoCo Summer 2018: 6.68CubingUSA Nationals 2018: 6.65Warm Up Sydney 2018: 6.79Australian Nationals 2018: 6.76St Kevin's College Spring 2018: 6.72Odd Day in Sydney 2018: 6.87Melbourne Cube Days 2018: 6.29Northside Cube Day 2019: 7.13Adelaide Summer 2019: 5.02Cool Down Sydney 2019: 6.48Koalafication Canberra 2019: 5.57Cube for Cambodia 2019: 6.65Koalafication Melbourne 2019: 6.58Warm Up Canberra 2019: 5.32Warm Up Sydney 2019: 6.37WCA World Championship 2019: 6.78Odd Day in Sydney 2019: 6.62Darwin Open 2020: 7.08Brisbane Is Back On 2021: 6.70Turning in Townsville 2021: 7.35Canberra Autumn 2022: 6.73Queensland Open 2022: 6.74Turning in Townsville 2022: 7.22Australian Nationals 2022: 4.90Rubik's WCA Oceanic Championship 2022: 6.58Turning in Townsville 2023: 6.47Melbourne Summer 2023: 6.85Queensland Open 2023: 6.44Rubik's WCA World Championship 2023: 6.15Australian Nationals 2023: 6.42Melbourne Summer 2024: 5.90Brisbane Summer 2024: 6.37Half Turns in Hallett Cove 2024: 6.38Mount Gambier Open 2024: 7.18Turning in Townsville 2024: 6.89Queensland Open 2024: 7.21Australian Nationals 2024: 6.67Melbourne Summer 2025: 6.24Warm Up Seattle 2025: 6.52Rubik's WCA World Championship 2025: 5.51Australian Nationals 2025: 6.94Zhuhai Pi Day 2026: 7.06Solving in Sale 2026: 6.92Wagga Autumn 2026: 6.38Australian Nationals 2026: 6.86Klemzig Kubing Decathlon 2026: 5.804.9014.0325 Feb 201222 Aug 2026

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-4 3×3 single — 38 people have one; it is 0.90 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 one-handed single — 4 people have one; it is 1.67 away.

Targets move as he improves.