Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Canada → Leo Min-Bedford

People · Canada

Leo Min-Bedford

Skewb · top 0.035% of 73,281 all-time · competing since April 2014 · 2014MINB01

Leo Min-Bedford has been competing for 12 years. His best event is the Skewb: a personal-best single of 0.97, set at Selangor Cube Open 2019, puts him in the top 0.035% of the 73,281 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 1st in Canada. Until July 2019, no official Skewb solve in the world had been that fast. Across 62 competitions since April 2014, he has put 2,508 official solves on the record across eleven events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 15% around a typical one; 83% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. That figure sets aside his 38 DNFs. His 3×3 best has come down from 22.25 in April 2014 to 6.57, a 70% improvement. Leo has entered 62 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

Skewb
best event — top 0.035% of 73,281 all-time
0.97
signature single · Selangor Cube Open 2019
2,508
official solves on the record
15%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 83% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingCanada
Skewb0.972.41
top 0.035%1 / 2,907
Pyraminx1.432.32
top 0.34%11 / 4,858
3×36.578.56
top 0.91%92 / 10,392
3×3 one-handed9.9813.69
top 1.0%22 / 2,620
2×21.593.20
top 2.6%165 / 7,173
Square-18.8212.92
top 4.2%31 / 952
4×438.5541.71
top 10.4%246 / 3,118
Megaminx1:14.491:25.08
top 18.3%168 / 1,375
3×3 Fewest Moves34 moves36.33
early days — 3 solves80 / 283
5×52:19.872:32.84
top 61.0%804 / 1,499
Clock23.2430.48
top 73.0%723 / 1,029

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Toronto Open Spring 2014: 22.25Battle of Waterloo 2014: 20.23CanadianCUBING Fifty 2014: 16.27Toronto Open Summer 2014: 16.80Toronto Open Fall 2014: 15.32Toronto Open Winter 2015: 10.83Canadian Open 2015: 10.18US Nationals 2015: 11.36MCC Gamma 2015: 10.19Toronto Open Fall 2015: 10.61Michigan Cubing Club Alpha 2016: 10.21Toronto Limited Spring 2016: 10.37Newmarket Open 2016: 9.74Michigan 2016: 10.05Toronto Limited Summer 2016: 10.69Toronto Limited Fall 2016: 8.73London Limited Spring 2017: 8.72Newmarket Open 2017: 9.99CubingUSA Nationals 2017: 8.39Canadian Open 2017: 8.93Pickering 2017: 8.75Oakville Limited Fall 2017: 7.98Oakville Limited Winter 2018: 8.48Pickering Spring 2018: 8.18Upstate Cubing 2018: 7.20Oakville Limited Spring 2018: 9.31National Capital Region 2018: 7.56Newmarket Open 2018: 9.12Battle of Waterloo 2018: 8.59Oakville Limited Fall 2018: 6.57Oakville Autumn Limited 2018: 8.44Japan Championship 2018: 8.47Ajax Winter 2019: 7.60Garrettsville G-Men Classic 2019: 8.50Return to Toronto 2019: 9.498 Wing Limited 2019: 7.72Upstate Cubing 2019: 9.34Newmarket Open 2019: 10.06Canadian Championship 2019: 8.82CubingUSA Nationals 2019: 8.37Cubing in the 6ix 2019: 8.39Battle of Waterloo 2019: 7.91Selangor Cube Open 2019: 8.27Ayase 2020: 9.98Rubik's WCA North American Championship 2022: 8.54CubingUSA Great Lakes Championship 2022: 8.13YJ Malaysia Cube Open 2022: 8.12Oakville Fall B 2022: 7.13Waterloo Favourites B 2023: 7.00London Winter A 2023: 7.96Open de Montréal 2023: 7.90Rubik's WCA World Championship 2023: 8.30Rubik's x Speedcubing Canada All-Stars 2023: 8.01Appleby Fall A 2023: 7.21Défi Jeunesse Montréal 2023: 6.92Waterloo Favourites Autumn 2023: 7.186.5722.2526 Apr 201416 Dec 2023

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 Pyraminx single — 49 people have one; it is 0.43 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 0.57 away.

Targets move as he improves.