People · United States
Natalie Sharpe
2×2 · top 45.9% of 189,179 all-time · competing since August 2025 · 2025SHAR31
Natalie Sharpe has been competing for a year. Her best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 5.55, set at Ohio Championship 2026, puts her in the top 45.9% of the 189,179 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 18,860th in the United States. Across 30 competitions since August 2025, she has put 363 official solves on the record across nine events. Solve to solve, her 3×3 times vary about 20% around a typical one; 99% of the 36,406 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. Her 3×3 best has come down from 1:31.47 in August 2025 to 31.61, a 65% improvement. Natalie has entered 30 competitions, more competitions than 98% of everyone who has ever competed.
Standing, event by event
vs everyone ever ranked| Event | PB single | PB average | All-time standing | United States | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2×2 | 5.55 | 13.90 | top 45.9% | 18,860 / 41,674 | |
| Skewb | 11.33 | 20.95 | top 62.6% | 11,756 / 19,164 | |
| 3×3 | 31.61 | 41.37 | top 65.3% | 39,774 / 60,666 | |
| Pyraminx | 13.56 | 20.89 | top 75.8% | 22,818 / 29,168 | |
| Megaminx | 3:07.42 | 3:51.04 | top 76.9% | 6,161 / 8,026 | |
| 3×3 one-handed | 1:14.79 | 1:39.37 | top 90.8% | 14,101 / 15,900 | |
| 4×4 | 2:29.77 | — | early days — 2 solves | 17,802 / 19,354 | |
| Clock | 38.41 | 50.19 | top 92.3% | 8,495 / 9,172 | |
| 5×5 | 5:13.13 | 5:44.99 | top 97.4% | 9,374 / 9,537 |
Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.
The line so far
Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.
The story so far
- 11 Apr 2026Three personal bests in one day at Algorithms in Archbold 2026.
- 19 Mar 2026First sub-60 3×3: 54.78 at Michigan Mini 39 2026.
- 16 Nov 2025Three personal bests in one day at Bowling Green Fall 2025.
- 15 Aug 2025First competition: Michigan Championship 2025. A 1:31.47 3×3 single to start from.
Competitions
- Redhawk Fall OH 2026 · 17 Oct 2026
- Bowling Green Fall 2026 · 3 Oct 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Oberlin Mid-Autumn Festival 2026 · 25 Sep 2026
- Michigan Mini 45 2026 · 24 Sep 2026
- Ohio Championship 2026 · 11 Sep 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Oberlin Weeknights II 2026 · 3 Sep 2026
- Michigan Mini 44 2026 · 27 Aug 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Mini 43 2026 · 7 Jul 2026
- Rubik's WCA North American Championship 2026 · 2 Jul 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Mini 42 2026 · 18 Jun 2026 — 1 personal best set
- CubingUSA Great Lakes Championship 2026 · 5 Jun 2026 — 2 personal bests set
- Michigan Mini 41 2026 · 21 May 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Evanston Qualifier 2026 · 17 May 2026 — 2 personal bests set
- Toledo Big & Blind 2026 · 16 May 2026
- 3x3 in Madison 2026 · 8 May 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Mini 40 2026 · 16 Apr 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Algorithms in Archbold 2026 · 11 Apr 2026 — 3 personal bests set
- Michigan Mini 39 2026 · 19 Mar 2026 — 2 personal bests set
- Deerfield Dodecahedrons 2026 · 7 Feb 2026
- Imagination Station B 2026 · 4 Jan 2026 — 2 personal bests set
- Michigan Medium 2025 · 29 Dec 2025
- Michigan Mini 38 2025 · 8 Dec 2025
- Evanston Fall Favorites A 2025 · 6 Dec 2025
- Bowling Green Fall 2025 · 16 Nov 2025 — 3 personal bests set
- Michigan Mini 37 2025 · 6 Nov 2025 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Mini 36 2025 · 13 Oct 2025 — 1 personal best set
- Washtenaw Slow Fall 2025 · 20 Sep 2025 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Mini 35 2025 · 18 Sep 2025 — 2 personal bests set
- Michigan Mini 34 2025 · 28 Aug 2025 — 1 personal best set
- Michigan Championship 2025 · 15 Aug 2025
Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.
The circuit
The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to her.
- Luke Garrett — met in 52 rounds, never finished ahead
- Wesley Barwinski — met in 47 rounds, never finished ahead
- Sujan Feist — met in 43 rounds, never finished ahead
Next targets
- A sub-5 2×2 single — 74,472 people have one; it is 0.55 away.
- A sub-10 Skewb single — 40,788 people have one; it is 1.33 away.
Targets move as she improves.