Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Hungary → Milán Baticz

People · Hungary

Milán Baticz

3×3 · top 1.1% of 284,439 all-time · competing since November 2005 · 2005BATI01

Milán Baticz has been competing for 21 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 6.77, set at Budapest Open 2018, puts him in the top 1.1% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 19th in Hungary. Until November 2010, no official 3×3 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 59 competitions since November 2005, he has put 3,420 official solves on the record across 15 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 12% around a typical one, steadier than 76% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 22.94 in November 2005 to 6.77, a 70% improvement. He has entered 59 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

3×3
best event — top 1.1% of 284,439 all-time
6.77
signature single · Budapest Open 2018
3,420
official solves on the record
12%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 76% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingHungary
3×36.778.38
top 1.1%19 / 1,226
2×21.532.53
top 2.3%41 / 919
Pyraminx2.665.34
top 2.6%26 / 495
4×431.1434.60
top 3.5%23 / 509
5×557.921:00.12
top 4.5%16 / 315
3×3 one-handed13.3415.93
top 5.0%28 / 445
3×3 Fewest Moves26 moves—
top 6.2%10 / 117
3×3 blindfolded45.751:00.04
top 8.5%8 / 102
Megaminx58.091:05.27
top 9.0%14 / 190
7×72:55.383:14.65
top 9.3%9 / 116
Square-115.5223.53
top 17.6%23 / 167
6×62:14.612:17.30
top 17.8%24 / 130
Clock9.0910.39
top 20.4%35 / 185
3×3 Multi-Blind4 of 4 cubes · 38:12—
top 45.1%18 / 40
4×4 blindfolded12:49.00—
early days — 3 solves12 / 14

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Hungarian Championship 2005: 22.94German Open 2006: 16.01Czech Open 2006: 16.13European Rubik's Cube Championship 2006: 14.67Belgian Open 2007: 11.64German Open 2007: 13.65Swedish Open 2007: 12.77World Rubik's Cube Championship 2007: 10.71Belgian Open 2008: 11.44Pabianice Open 2008: 10.68Polish Open 2008: 11.44Czech Open 2008: 9.28Dutch Masters 2008: 11.61European Championship 2008: 10.86Hungarian Open 2008: 9.93Swiss Open 2009: 8.86Mantua Open 2009: 11.20World Rubik's Cube Championship 2009: 10.59Hungarian Open 2009: 11.44Silesia Open 2009: 9.65Bristol Spring 2010: 9.30Slovenian Open 2010: 10.66Cube 'n Roll Italian Open 2010: 9.84Czech Open 2010: 10.02Austrian Open 2010: 9.61Hungarian Open 2010: 10.22Pabianice Open 2010: 10.40European Rubik's Cube Championship 2010: 8.63Helsinki Open 2011: 9.30Milan Cube Open 2011: 7.58Romanian Open 2011: 9.53Czech Open 2011: 8.71Hungarian Open 2011: 8.96Austrian Open 2011: 9.56World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011: 9.06Dutch Open 2011: 8.09Croatian Rubik Open 2011: 8.27Zune Open 2012: 9.13Italian Open 2012: 9.15Romanian Open 2012: 8.06Czech Open 2012: 8.33Bosnia and Herzegovina Open 2012: 6.93Hungarian Open 2012: 9.09European Rubik's Cube Championship 2012: 8.43Serbian Open 2013: 8.03Hungarian Open 2013: 9.75Hungarian Open 2014: 9.04PoliMi Italian Open 2014: 8.86Hungarian Nationals 2015: 8.26Hungarian Nationals 2016: 7.21Tårnby Cube Træf 2016: 8.67VI QB'er 2017: 7.67Hungarian Nationals 2017: 7.44World Rubik's Cube Championship 2017: 8.67Hungarian Open 2017: 6.87Budapest Open 2018: 6.77Hungarian Open 2018: 7.68Hungarian Summer 2019: 7.96Hungarian Open 2019: 7.536.7722.9419 Nov 200520 Sep 2019

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 0.77 away.
  • A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,032 people have one; it is 0.53 away.

Targets move as he improves.