Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Poland → Mateusz Fydrych

People · Poland

Mateusz Fydrych

2×2 · top 2.2% of 186,767 all-time · competing since July 2011 · 2011FYDR01

Mateusz Fydrych has been competing for 15 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 1.52, set at Kielce Cube Attack 2014, puts him in the top 2.2% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 233rd in Poland. Until November 2008, no official 2×2 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 55 competitions since July 2011, he has put 3,101 official solves on the record across 13 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 11% around a typical one, steadier than 83% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 13.63 in July 2011 to 8.23, a 40% improvement. Mateusz has entered 55 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 2.2% of 186,767 all-time
1.52
signature single · Kielce Cube Attack 2014
3,101
official solves on the record
11%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 83% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingPoland
2×21.522.50
top 2.2%233 / 5,422
3×38.239.78
top 3.2%325 / 6,576
4×430.7638.24
top 3.3%116 / 2,851
Pyraminx3.536.06
top 5.6%391 / 4,406
3×3 Fewest Moves28 moves—
top 9.9%62 / 466
3×3 one-handed16.4420.08
top 11.2%263 / 2,176
Skewb5.077.72
top 18.7%707 / 2,810
5×51:24.491:36.29
top 22.8%323 / 1,442
3×3 blindfolded2:07.362:35.69
top 35.9%179 / 466
3×3 Multi-Blind2 of 2 cubes · 7:57—
top 61.5%125 / 203
6×63:59.45—
early days — 3 solves417 / 669
Megaminx2:49.15—
early days — 3 solves990 / 1,384
Square-144.09—
top 70.1%672 / 1,002

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Swierklany Open 2011: 13.63Polish Nationals 2011: 10.90Cubing Spring Grudziadz 2012: 11.38Silesia Open 2012: 11.55Industrial Cube 2012: 10.11European Rubik's Cube Championship 2012: 10.96Jura Open 2012: 10.18Rybnik Open 2013: 10.47Polish Open 2013: 10.31Austrian Open 2013: 9.69Kraków Open 2013: 10.52Polish Nationals 2013: 11.30Grudziadz Open 2013: 11.22SLS Jastrzebie 2013: 10.72SLS Zaglebie 2013: 11.61SLS Swierklany 2013: 10.04SLS Czestochowa 2013: 10.89Warsaw Open 2014: 10.13SLS Bielsko-Biala 2014: 11.06Polish Open 2014: 10.24SLS Gliwice 2014: 10.13SLS Rybnik 2014: 8.45SLS Tarnowskie Gory 2014: 9.77SLS Chorzow 2014: 10.10Aleksandrus Cube 2014: 9.82Polish Nationals 2014: 9.10Kielce Cube Attack 2014: 10.48Kaliska Open 2014: 10.39Bydgoszcz Summer 2014: 8.70Krakow Cubing Spree 2014: 8.93Santa Claus Cube Race 2014: 9.19ŚLS Gliwice 2015: 8.36Polish Open 2015: 10.44ŚLS Zawiercie 2015: 9.10SLS Rybnik 2015: 8.76Radomsko Cube Theory 2015: 9.79ŚLS Sosnowiec 2015: 9.50Kaliska Open 2015: 9.18Warsaw Cube Masters 2015: 8.23Polish Championship 2015: 8.89ŚLS Wodzisław Śląski 2015: 9.24Santa Claus Cube Race 2015: 9.01Beskidy Cubing Day 2016: 8.92Kaskada Open 2016: 9.36Tuwim Cube Race 2016: 8.50Elektryk Cube Race 2016: 9.14Santa Claus Cube Race 2016: 9.456 Sides of Silesia 2017: 8.72SLS Gliwice 2017: 8.41ŚLS Jastrzębie Zdrój 2017: 9.49Polish Open 2017: 9.39Polish Nationals 2017: 8.55Project Jastrzębie-Zdrój 2018: 8.96Lubelska Liga Speedcubingu V Final 2019: 8.63Cubing Mine Rybnik 2024: 9.578.2313.6323 Jul 20116 Apr 2024

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,032 people have one; it is 0.52 away.
  • A sub-8 3×3 single — 7,931 people have one; it is 0.23 away.

Targets move as he improves.