People · India
Lalit Silwal
3×3 · top 14.5% of 284,439 all-time · competing since February 2014 · 2014SILW01
Lalit Silwal has been competing for 13 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 12.18, set at MathSoc Open 2016, puts him in the top 14.5% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 1,767th in India. Across 5 competitions since February 2014, he has put 87 official solves on the record across four events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 15% around a typical one; 84% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 20.37 in February 2014 to 12.18, a 40% improvement. Lalit has entered five competitions, more competitions than 83% of everyone who has ever competed.
Standing, event by event
vs everyone ever ranked| Event | PB single | PB average | All-time standing | India | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3×3 | 12.18 | 13.55 | top 14.5% | 1,767 / 20,018 | |
| 5×5 | 1:25.25 | 1:33.71 | top 23.5% | 267 / 1,525 | |
| 4×4 | 51.10 | 57.76 | top 26.0% | 769 / 4,186 | |
| 7×7 | 4:28.79 | 5:12.34 | top 40.7% | 126 / 360 |
Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.
The line so far
Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.
The story so far
- 27 Feb 2016Three personal bests in one day at MathSoc Open 2016.
- 21 Feb 2015First sub-15 3×3: 13.41 at MathSoc Open 2015.
- 21 Feb 2015Three personal bests in one day at MathSoc Open 2015.
- 31 May 2014First sub-20 3×3: 15.82 at National Cubing Region Open 2014.
- 14 Feb 2014First competition: MathSoc Open 2014. A 20.37 3×3 single to start from.
Competitions
- MathSoc Open 2016 · 27 Feb 2016 — 3 personal bests set
- Plenty o' Parity 2015 · 12 Dec 2015
- MathSoc Open 2015 · 21 Feb 2015 — 3 personal bests set
- National Cubing Region Open 2014 · 31 May 2014 — 1 personal best set
- MathSoc Open 2014 · 14 Feb 2014
Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.
The circuit
The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.
- Shivam Bansal — met in 19 rounds, finished ahead 4 times
- Akash Rupela — met in 17 rounds, never finished ahead
- Ujjawal Pabreja — met in 14 rounds, finished ahead once
Next targets
- A sub-12 3×3 single — 39,535 people have one; it is 0.18 away.
- A sub-1:00 5×5 single — 2,252 people have one; it is 25.25 away.
Targets move as he improves.