Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → India → Lakshay Sharma

People · India

Lakshay Sharma

Pyraminx · top 1.6% of 129,321 all-time · competing since October 2015 · 2015SHAR21

Lakshay Sharma has been competing for 11 years. His best event is the Pyraminx: a personal-best single of 2.26, set at Delhi Cubing Heat Wave 2018, puts him in the top 1.6% of the 129,321 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 83rd in India. Until July 2011, no official Pyraminx solve in the world had been that fast. Across 26 competitions since October 2015, he has put 1,152 official solves on the record across 13 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 14% around a typical one; 64% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 2×2 best has come down from 8.84 in October 2015 to 2.32, a 74% improvement. Lakshay has entered 26 competitions, more competitions than 98% of everyone who has ever competed.

Pyraminx
best event — top 1.6% of 129,321 all-time
2.26
signature single · Delhi Cubing Heat Wave 2018
1,152
official solves on the record
14%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 64% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingIndia
Pyraminx2.264.63
top 1.6%83 / 8,934
2×22.323.23
top 7.2%560 / 12,146
Skewb3.535.91
top 7.9%197 / 3,524
3×310.1712.48
top 8.0%893 / 20,018
3×3 one-handed17.5519.20
top 13.9%475 / 4,516
4×447.7255.10
top 21.8%637 / 4,186
Square-118.2526.06
top 24.0%155 / 805
Megaminx1:30.561:40.68
top 28.6%285 / 1,443
5×51:37.911:50.96
top 33.8%415 / 1,525
3×3 Fewest Moves40 moves42.00
top 48.3%225 / 600
7×75:48.006:40.59
top 64.6%220 / 360
6×64:05.564:29.89
top 67.3%334 / 531
Clock32.7646.22
top 87.6%880 / 1,092

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Delhi Autumn Open 2015: 8.84Great Indian Cubeathon 2016: 4.63MathSoc Open 2016: 3.96Indian Nationals 2016: 4.26National Cubing Region Open 2016: 3.03Shri Ram Cubing Challenge 2016: 3.04Cubing Complexity 2016: 3.59MathSoc Open 2017: 3.21Delhi Open 2017: 3.74SNU Open 2017: 3.26National Cubing Region Open 2017: 3.32Speedcubing ESYA 2017: 3.21Five Rivers Cube Open 2017: 2.44MathSoc Open 2018: 3.32Pink City Open 2018: 2.50Indian Open 2018: 2.48Delhi Cubing Heat Wave 2018: 2.49Speedcubing ESYA 2018: 2.69Five Rivers Cube Open 2018: 2.53Chandigarh Open 2019: 2.32Indian Nationals 2019: 2.432.328.8417 Oct 201511 Apr 2019

Best single per competition, 2×2. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-2 Pyraminx single — 1,476 people have one; it is 0.26 away.
  • A sub-2 2×2 single — 8,848 people have one; it is 0.32 away.

Targets move as he improves.