Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → China → Junqi Feng (冯骏骐)

People · China

Junqi Feng (冯骏骐)

Pyraminx · top 0.18% of 129,321 all-time · competing since October 2015 · 2015FENG12

Junqi Feng (冯骏骐) has been competing for 11 years. His best event is the Pyraminx: a personal-best single of 1.25, set at Altona Algorithms 2024, puts him in the top 0.18% of the 129,321 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 17th in China. Until January 2018, no official Pyraminx solve in the world had been that fast. Across 78 competitions since October 2015, he has put 4,250 official solves on the record across 15 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 15% around a typical one; 81% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 21.50 in October 2015 to 6.42, a 70% improvement. Junqi has entered 78 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

Pyraminx
best event — top 0.18% of 129,321 all-time
1.25
signature single · Altona Algorithms 2024
4,250
official solves on the record
15%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 81% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingChina
Pyraminx1.251.87
top 0.18%17 / 10,224
3×36.428.29
top 0.79%295 / 28,153
4×425.9931.49
top 0.98%92 / 5,926
3×3 one-handed10.0113.57
top 1.1%88 / 5,922
Skewb1.973.69
top 1.3%63 / 5,004
Clock3.844.38
top 2.0%31 / 1,843
2×21.723.29
top 3.2%406 / 15,796
Megaminx46.9656.49
top 3.8%83 / 1,678
Square-18.5711.74
top 3.8%49 / 1,362
5×51:00.091:06.32
top 5.6%260 / 2,816
6×62:01.802:19.36
top 11.7%247 / 1,349
3×3 blindfolded1:11.742:14.95
top 16.6%236 / 1,183
3×3 Fewest Moves31 moves37.33
top 17.4%183 / 1,058
7×73:34.313:46.90
top 21.3%428 / 1,261
3×3 Multi-Blind2 of 2 cubes · 13:35—
top 67.1%185 / 278

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Nanjing Autumn 2015: 21.50Zhenjiang Open 2015: 20.77Nanjing Spring 2016: 15.53Suzhou Open 2016: 13.10Chongqing Open 2016: 12.29Asian Championship 2016: 11.94Nanjing Autumn 2016: 11.63Zhenjiang Open 2016: 11.14Shanghai Love In ECNU 2017: 11.72China Championship 2017: 10.72Suzhou Open 2017: 9.24Zhenjiang Open 2017: 10.19Yangjiang Open 2018: 9.00Kunshan Open 2018: 10.30Nanjing Spring 2018: 10.27SJTU Open 2018: 10.15Hefei Summer 2018: 8.71Beijing Summer 2018: 9.37WCA Asian Championship 2018: 10.88China Championship 2018: 8.08Wuxi Autumn 2018: 8.92Nanjing Autumn 2018: 9.32SJTU Winter Open 2018: 10.32Xuzhou Spring 2019: 7.81Hefei Summer 2019: 8.51Shijiazhuang Open 2019: 8.64Linfen Open 2019: 9.22Huzhou Open 2019: 10.18Altona Algorithms 2019: 7.84Melbourne Summer 2020: 9.97Melbourne Summer 2021: 8.80Altona Algorithms Attempt 2 2021: 9.04December Series: Geelong says So-Long 2021: 9.18Melbourne Summer 2022: 9.81Rubik's WCA Oceanic Championship 2022: 9.73Melbourne Summer 2023: 10.80Brilliant Ballarat 2023: 8.61Speedcubing at Seaworks 2023: 8.37Chilling in Canberra 2023: 8.82South Australian Open 2023: 8.90Cubing with Penguins by Phillip Island 2023: 7.88Australian Nationals 2023: 7.81Melbourne Cube Days 2023: 8.62Malaysia Cube Championship 2023: 9.32Shenyang Open 2023: 8.39Tassie Summer 2024: 8.32Melbourne Summer 2024: 8.81Altona Algorithms 2024: 7.86Brilliant Ballarat 2024: 6.96Solving In Sale 2024: 8.59Vietnam Championship 2024: 8.18Xi'an Open 2024: 7.20Adelaide Summer 2025: 7.21Melbourne Summer 2025: 7.76Singapore Championship 2025: 6.99VIC State Championship 2025: 7.30Tokyo Summer 2025: 6.51Puzzling Pakenham Saturday 2025: 7.35Apollo Bay Cubing 2025: 8.13North-East Melbourne March Sunday 2026: 6.93West Melbourne Open 2026: 7.87Spark Melbourne Autumn Sunday 2026: 6.88Australian Nationals 2026: 7.05Geelong Winter 2026: 6.426.4221.5024 Oct 201529 Aug 2026

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 Pyraminx single — 49 people have one; it is 0.25 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 0.42 away.

Targets move as he improves.