Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → India → Imruthun Meenakshisundaram

People · India

Imruthun Meenakshisundaram

Pyraminx · top 2.1% of 129,321 all-time · competing since February 2017 · 2017MEEN01

Imruthun Meenakshisundaram has been competing for 10 years. His best event is the Pyraminx: a personal-best single of 2.46, set at Chennai Cubing Club Meetup 2023, puts him in the top 2.1% of the 129,321 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 111th in India. Until January 2011, no official Pyraminx solve in the world had been that fast. Across 51 competitions since February 2017, he has put 1,692 official solves on the record across 14 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 12% around a typical one, steadier than 62% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 19.74 in February 2017 to 7.65, a 61% improvement. Imruthun has entered 51 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

Pyraminx
best event — top 2.1% of 129,321 all-time
2.46
signature single · Chennai Cubing Club Meetup 2023
1,692
official solves on the record
12%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 62% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingIndia
Pyraminx2.463.78
top 2.1%111 / 8,934
3×37.659.41
top 2.2%207 / 20,018
3×3 one-handed11.6016.29
top 2.5%74 / 4,516
Skewb2.976.70
top 4.8%112 / 3,524
2×22.253.02
top 6.6%511 / 12,146
4×435.8942.35
top 7.6%203 / 4,186
7×73:08.233:27.15
top 12.7%45 / 360
5×51:15.451:20.04
top 15.7%171 / 1,525
6×62:11.722:24.83
top 16.1%73 / 531
Megaminx1:37.881:42.75
top 33.3%353 / 1,443
3×3 blindfolded2:05.29
top 35.2%161 / 598
Clock12.4415.10
top 37.1%315 / 1,092
3×3 Fewest Moves43 moves
top 59.0%298 / 600
3×3 Multi-Blind2 of 3 cubes · 18:26
early days — 1 solve138 / 168

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Carte Blanche Kube Open 2017: 19.74SRM Cube Open 2017: 16.59Ban Parity Open 2017: 14.55VIT Rubik's Cube Challenge 2017: 13.50Grand Cube Open 2017: 17.01CMI Tessellate Cube Open 2018: 13.00Carte Blanche Kube Open 2018: 12.16Anaadyanta Cube Open 2018: 12.43SRM Cube Open 2018: 11.58SSN Cube Open 2018: 12.38CMI Autumn Open 2018: 9.87Phoenix C3 Open 2018: 10.41KK Charity Cube Open 2018: 10.95Shaastra Cube Open 2019: 10.92VDCA Winter Open 2019: 10.00Carte Blanche Kube Open 2019: 9.88Pragyan Cube Open 2019: 9.66Bengaluru Summer Open 2019: 11.26Sri Ramachandra Cube Open 2019: 10.48Chennai Cube Open 2019: 9.02Tamil Nadu Cube Open Tournament 2022: 8.01Thoothukudi Cube Open 2022: 9.20KSRCT Cube Open 2022: 8.01Cubing Sunday in SSN 2022: 9.80Chennai Cubing Club Meetup 2023: 9.78CMI Tessellate Cube Open 2023: 8.99MCC Cube Open 2023: 8.28Hyderabad Cube Open 2023: 7.91SSN Cube Saturday 2023: 9.01NIT Trichy Cube Open 2023: 8.64CMI Tessellate Cube Open 2024: 7.65Rajalakshmi Engineering College Cube Open 2024: 8.97VIT Cube Open 2024: 8.02Tamil Nadu Cube Challenge 2024: 8.89Kumaraguru Cube Open 2024: 9.43SSN Cube Open 2025: 9.21Pragyan Cube Open 2025: 8.08Anna Kalyanam in Jolarpet 2025: 10.91Cubing Comes to Madurai 2025: 9.05Mumbai Cubing Heat Wave 2025: 8.54Pune Summer Open 2025: 8.26Play Extreme Cubing A 2025: 10.59VIT Cube Open 2025: 8.55VR Bengaluru Cube Open B 2025: 9.47Six Face Cube Run at TRINS 2025: 9.42Kalanjiam Cubing Challenge 2025: 9.31Gurugram Cube Open 2026: 9.267.6519.7418 Feb 201719 Apr 2026

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-2 Pyraminx single — 1,476 people have one; it is 0.46 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 1.65 away.

Targets move as he improves.