People · Australia
Gurdev Singh
3×3 · top 65.0% of 284,439 all-time · competing since October 2019 · 2019SING35
Gurdev Singh has been competing for 7 years. His best event is the 3×3: a personal-best single of 31.45, set at West Melbourne Open 2026, puts him in the top 65.0% of the 284,439 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 7,272nd in Australia. Across 4 competitions since October 2019, he has put 63 official solves on the record across four events. His 3×3 best has come down from 1:08.09 in October 2019 to 31.45, a 54% improvement. Gurdev has entered four competitions, more competitions than 78% of everyone who has ever competed.
Standing, event by event
vs everyone ever ranked| Event | PB single | PB average | All-time standing | Australia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3×3 | 31.45 | 41.47 | top 65.0% | 7,272 / 11,709 | |
| 2×2 | 10.86 | 16.41 | top 81.0% | 6,831 / 8,567 | |
| Pyraminx | 14.91 | 32.47 | top 81.5% | 4,982 / 5,993 | |
| Skewb | 18.32 | 24.31 | top 86.8% | 3,060 / 3,534 |
Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.
The line so far
Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.
The story so far
- 11 Apr 2026Four personal bests in one day at West Melbourne Open 2026.
- 24 Jan 2026First sub-60 3×3: 53.34 at Melbourne Summer 2026.
- 5 Oct 2019First competition: Altona Algorithms 2019. A 1:08.09 3×3 single to start from.
Competitions
- Australian Nationals 2026 · 9 Jul 2026 — 2 personal bests set
- West Melbourne Open 2026 · 11 Apr 2026 — 4 personal bests set
- Melbourne Summer 2026 · 24 Jan 2026 — 1 personal best set
- Altona Algorithms 2019 · 5 Oct 2019
Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.
The circuit
The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.
- Zac Meulenkamp — met in 14 rounds, never finished ahead
- Ben Wakelin — met in 14 rounds, never finished ahead
- Emmet Hobbs — met in 14 rounds, never finished ahead
Next targets
- A sub-30 3×3 single — 177,856 people have one; it is 1.45 away.
- A sub-10 2×2 single — 145,545 people have one; it is 0.86 away.
Targets move as he improves.