Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Italy → Fabrizio Cirnigliaro

People · Italy

Fabrizio Cirnigliaro

3×3 Multi-Blind · top 9.5% of 4,268 all-time · competing since June 2008 · 2008CIRN01

Fabrizio Cirnigliaro has been competing for 18 years. His best event is the 3×3 Multi-Blind: a personal-best single of 14 of 14 cubes · 55:05, set at PoliMi Italian Open 2014, puts him in the top 9.5% of the 4,268 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 12th in Italy. Across 64 competitions since June 2008, he has put 812 official solves on the record across eight events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 15% around a typical one; 87% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds hold a tighter spread. His 3×3 best has come down from 39.22 in June 2008 to 20.20, a 48% improvement. Fabrizio has entered 64 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

3×3 Multi-Blind
best event — top 9.5% of 4,268 all-time
14 of 14 cubes · 55:05
signature single · PoliMi Italian Open 2014
812
official solves on the record
15%
solve-to-solve spread · wider than 87% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingItaly
3×3 Multi-Blind14 of 14 cubes · 55:05
top 9.5%12 / 100
3×3 blindfolded1:11.541:16.21
top 16.6%43 / 244
2×24.919.88
top 38.2%958 / 2,068
3×320.2024.46
top 40.5%1,346 / 2,882
4×4 blindfolded7:41.988:49.25
top 42.0%24 / 48
5×5 blindfolded17:04.00
top 48.7%16 / 30
4×41:49.112:52.48
top 76.2%900 / 1,206
3×3 Fewest Moves49 moves
early days — 1 solve207 / 266

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Italian Open 2008: 39.22Italian Open 2009: 30.16Mantua Open 2009: 30.14Obei Obei Open 2009: 27.27Milan Cube Day 2010: 23.72Montpellier Open 2010: 25.90Milan BLD Day 2010: 25.80Cube 'n Roll Italian Open 2010: 23.83Barcelona Rubik's Summer Open 2010: 25.02S.P.Q.R. Italian Rubik's Cube Championship 2010: 20.20Mediolanum Open 2010: 23.52Florence Open 2010: 24.11Halloween Cube Open 2010: 25.16Milan Cube Open 2011: 23.61Mantua Spring 2011: 29.21Italian Rubik's Cube Championship 2011: 23.50Roma Open 2011: 23.25Montpellier Open 2011: 24.81Big CubingItaly Open 2011: 23.33Veneto Open 2011: 27.38Castelbelforte Cube Battle 2011: 22.09Milan Blind Day 2011: 23.55Italian Open 2011: 24.56World Rubik's Cube Championship 2011: 21.66Mantua Winter 2011: 23.16Milan Cube Open 2012: 24.68Schio Open 2012: 22.59Legnano Open 2012: 24.93Italian Open 2012: 25.80Milan Blind Day 2012: 23.94Italian Championship 2012: 23.63Milan Winter Open 2013: 23.00Italian Championship 2013: 24.47Trieste Open 2013: 23.02Monticello Conte Otto Open 2013: 33.90Valencia Summer Open 2013: 22.88Milan Blind Day 2013: 30.66Big CubingItaly Open 2013: 34.53Italian Championship 2014: 26.63Legnano Open 2014: 28.78Big CubingItaly 2014: 27.00No Parity Open 2014: 23.93Respighi Open 2014: 31.96PoliMi Italian Open 2014: 30.19PoliMi Open 2015: 28.02Cannes Open 2015: 28.10Italian Championship 2015: 27.83Italian Open 2015: 27.94Cubelonia 2016: 26.48Mantua Tiny Open 2016: 30.46Lyon Megaminx Open 2016: 32.71Cannes Summer Open 2016: 24.08European Rubik's Cube Championship 2016: 23.17Italian Championship 2016: 28.61PoliMi Open 2016: 29.11Swisscubing Cup I 2017: 27.33Madrid Open 2017: 30.92Milan Cube Day 2017: 27.36Mantua Summer 2017: 32.98World Rubik's Cube Championship 2017: 31.90Italian Championship 2017: 28.0420.2039.2221 Jun 200816 Dec 2017

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1:00 3×3 blindfolded single — 1,593 people have one; it is 11.54 away.
  • A sub-4 2×2 single — 49,452 people have one; it is 0.91 away.

Targets move as he improves.