Saturday 24 October 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 24 October 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Norway → Erlend Edland

People · Norway

Erlend Edland

2×2 · top 1.2% of 189,179 all-time · competing since March 2017 · 2017EDLA01

Erlend Edland has been competing for 10 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 1.24, set at Sandnes Open 2017, puts him in the top 1.2% of the 189,179 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 19th in Norway. Until November 2008, no official 2×2 solve in the world had been that fast. Across 3 competitions since March 2017, he has put 163 official solves on the record across seven events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 15% around a typical one, an early reading from 7 counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 18.53 in March 2017 to 11.48, a 38% improvement. Erlend has entered three competitions, more competitions than 69% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 1.2% of 189,179 all-time
1.24
signature single · Sandnes Open 2017
163
official solves on the record

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingNorway
2×21.244.66
top 1.2%19 / 1,217
Skewb4.1311.01
top 11.9%73 / 537
3×311.4814.66
top 12.1%197 / 1,643
3×3 one-handed19.2222.91
top 18.5%83 / 521
Pyraminx6.8812.79
top 26.9%276 / 879
4×41:02.921:17.42
top 39.6%207 / 596
Megaminx4:23.07—
early days — 2 solves237 / 268

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Norwegian Championship 2017: 18.53Sandnes Open 2017: 13.33Sandnes Open 2018: 11.4811.4818.5318 Mar 201722 Sep 2018

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 2×2 single — 1,050 people have one; it is 0.24 away.
  • A sub-4 Skewb single — 8,121 people have one; it is 0.13 away.

Targets move as he improves.