Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Latvia → Emils Gaujenietis

People · Latvia

Emils Gaujenietis

2×2 · top 17.0% of 186,767 all-time · competing since November 2017 · 2017GAUJ01

Emils Gaujenietis has been competing for 9 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 3.23, set at Latvian Open 2018, puts him in the top 17.0% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 42nd in Latvia. Across 10 competitions since November 2017, he has put 157 official solves on the record across five events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 17% around a typical one, an early reading from 9 counted rounds. That figure sets aside his 5 DNFs. His 2×2 best has come down from 8.91 in November 2017 to 3.23, a 64% improvement. Emils has entered ten competitions, more competitions than 92% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 17.0% of 186,767 all-time
3.23
signature single · Latvian Open 2018
157
official solves on the record

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingLatvia
2×23.236.10
top 17.0%42 / 237
Pyraminx8.8212.10
top 43.3%91 / 185
3×323.4325.79
top 49.0%135 / 309
Skewb12.6321.77
top 69.1%86 / 117
4×42:12.382:32.86
top 86.7%90 / 112

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Latvian Open 2017: 8.91Tartu Open 2017: 5.55Kaunas Open 2018: 3.35Pärnu Open 2018: 4.75Vilnius Open 2018: 4.52Riga Open 2018: 4.41Tallinn Open 2018: 4.72Sigulda Open 2018: 5.24Latvian Open 2018: 3.23Tartu Open 2018: 7.063.238.914 Nov 20178 Dec 2018

Best single per competition, 2×2. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-3 2×2 single — 26,570 people have one; it is 0.23 away.
  • A sub-8 Pyraminx single — 46,752 people have one; it is 0.82 away.

Targets move as he improves.