Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → United States → David Skirmont

People · United States

David Skirmont

2×2 · top 63.4% of 186,767 all-time · competing since November 2016 · 2016SKIR01

David Skirmont has been competing for 10 years. His best event is the 2×2: a personal-best single of 7.37, set at SacCubing III 2018, puts him in the top 63.4% of the 186,767 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 26,097th in the United States. Across 6 competitions since November 2016, he has put 48 official solves on the record across five events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 19% around a typical one, an early reading from 5 counted rounds. That figure sets aside his 2 DNFs. His 3×3 best has come down from 1:34.48 in November 2016 to 54.54, a 42% improvement. David has entered six competitions, more competitions than 86% of everyone who has ever competed.

2×2
best event — top 63.4% of 186,767 all-time
7.37
signature single · SacCubing III 2018
48
official solves on the record

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingUnited States
2×27.3714.91
top 63.4%26,097 / 40,951
Skewb12.9318.89
top 70.4%13,233 / 18,907
Pyraminx16.3218.75
top 86.0%25,343 / 28,708
3×354.541:04.36
top 88.9%54,393 / 59,724
Clock43.55
early days — 2 solves8,513 / 8,927

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

Berkeley Fall 2016: 1:34.48Berkeley Winter 2017: 1:08.24Berkeley Spring 2017: 1:36.32Berkeley Fall 2017: 1:10.85SacCubing III 2018: 54.5454.541:36.3219 Nov 201627 Jan 2018

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-6 2×2 single — 95,042 people have one; it is 1.37 away.
  • A sub-12 Skewb single — 48,404 people have one; it is 0.93 away.

Targets move as he improves.