Sunday 6 September 2026 Rebuilt nightly from the WCA's official results · export of 6 September 2026 · About
The Middle Three
People → Poland → Cezary Mach

People · Poland

Cezary Mach

Skewb · top 0.064% of 73,281 all-time · competing since March 2018 · 2018MACH04

Cezary Mach has been competing for 8 years. His best event is the Skewb: a personal-best single of 1.05, set at GLS III 2023, puts him in the top 0.064% of the 73,281 people who have ever been ranked in the event, and 13th in Poland. Until July 2019, no official Skewb solve in the world had been that fast. Across 62 competitions since March 2018, he has put 3,053 official solves on the record across 14 events. Solve to solve, his 3×3 times vary about 12% around a typical one, steadier than 69% of the 35,811 competitors with ten or more counted rounds. His 3×3 best has come down from 30.47 in March 2018 to 6.67, a 78% improvement. Cezary has entered 62 competitions, more competitions than 99% of everyone who has ever competed.

Skewb
best event — top 0.064% of 73,281 all-time
1.05
signature single · GLS III 2023
3,053
official solves on the record
12%
solve-to-solve spread · steadier than 69% of the field

Standing, event by event

vs everyone ever ranked
EventPB singlePB averageAll-time standingPoland
Skewb1.052.13
top 0.064%13 / 2,810
3×36.679.00
top 1.0%112 / 6,576
2×21.343.52
top 1.5%174 / 5,422
Pyraminx2.323.71
top 1.8%141 / 4,406
Megaminx47.2054.88
top 3.9%83 / 1,384
3×3 one-handed14.0718.17
top 6.2%154 / 2,176
4×437.1745.36
top 8.9%277 / 2,851
Clock10.0311.45
top 25.2%467 / 1,549
Square-119.1323.07
top 25.9%277 / 1,002
5×51:30.471:38.95
top 27.7%383 / 1,442
3×3 blindfolded2:23.22
top 41.1%195 / 466
3×3 Fewest Moves44 moves
early days — 2 solves302 / 466
6×64:04.06
early days — 3 solves430 / 669
7×76:42.37
early days — 2 solves413 / 546

Percentile against all competitors ever ranked in each event, a fairer measure than raw rank, because the pools differ by a factor of ten.

The line so far

GLS Cup I 2018: 30.47GLS Cup II 2018: 26.82GLS Cup III 2018: 20.85GLS Cup IV 2018: 19.42GLS Cup V 2018: 16.10GLS Cup Final 2018: 16.98GLS Winter Camp 2019: 17.01Grudziądz Open 2019: 13.77GLS Cup I 2019: 14.80GLS Cup II 2019: 13.41Gdańsk Cubing Summer Camp 2019: 14.73GLS Cup III 2019: 12.58Polish Championship 2019: 11.22GLS Cup IV 2019: 13.44GLS Gdynia 2020: 12.86Gdańsk Open 2020: 11.57Lubelska Liga Speedcubingu I Bełżyce 2021: 11.13Project Kedzierzyn-Kozle 2021: 10.54Polish Championship 2021: 10.32Cube4fun League Koło 2022: 9.84Olsztyn Spring Open 2022: 9.17Szczecin Open 2022: 9.26Polish Championship 2022: 10.04Rubik's WCA European Championship 2022: 8.39Cube4fun in Warsaw 2022: 9.23Gdańsk Open 2022: 7.98Lake Cubing Szczecinek 2022: 9.29GLS I 2023: 9.75Cube4fun in Warsaw 2023: 8.26Ice Cubing Szczecinek 2023: 6.67Energy Cube Konin 2023: 9.44GLS II 2023: 8.64Energy Cube Koło 2023: 9.67GLS III 2023: 7.93Żmigród Open 2023: 8.62Energy Cube Ciechanów 2023: 8.61Olsztyn Open 2023: 9.10GLS IV 2023: 9.43Giżycko Open 2023: 8.63Rubik's WCA World Championship 2023: 9.57GLS V 2023: 9.49Polish Championship 2023: 9.36Warsaw Cube Masters 2023: 9.15GLS Final 2023: 8.40Winter Vibe Wrocław 2024: 9.91GLS I 2024: 8.67GLS II 2024: 8.96Energy Cube Konin 2024: 8.74GLS III 2024: 8.48Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu IV 2024: 8.10Rubik's WCA European Championship 2024: 9.15Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu V 2024: 8.61Polish Championship 2024: 8.94Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu Final 2024: 9.37Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu I 2025: 9.97Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu II 2025: 8.30Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu III 2025: 9.44Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu IV 2025: 8.94Polish Championship 2025: 8.60Gdańska Liga Speedcubingu Final 2025: 8.92GLS Gdańsk II 2026: 8.736.6730.473 Mar 201821 Mar 2026

Best single per competition, 3×3. Faster is higher — the axis is the right way up.

The story so far

Competitions

Reading this page: a single is one solve's time · an average is the middle three of five solves, best and worst discarded · a PB is a personal best · a DNF (did not finish) is an attempt with no valid result: a popped piece, an unsolved face, an over-limit memorisation · top X% compares against everyone ever ranked in that event, which is fairer than raw rank because event pools differ tenfold.

The circuit

The people whose scorecards keep turning up next to his.

Next targets

  • A sub-1 Skewb single — 35 people have one; it is 0.05 away.
  • A sub-6 3×3 single — 1,376 people have one; it is 0.67 away.

Targets move as he improves.